Toggle menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

History:stolen-history: Difference between revisions

From wiki.AlienShine
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 20: Line 20:
In other words, contemporary interpretation of his creations is that it was a fantasy of the author. There is no historical evidence that Capriccio artists were making stuff up. Such an interpretation appears to be a very convenient way to explain the inconvenient truth.
In other words, contemporary interpretation of his creations is that it was a fantasy of the author. There is no historical evidence that Capriccio artists were making stuff up. Such an interpretation appears to be a very convenient way to explain the inconvenient truth.


==== Below a collection from [[wikipedia:Giovanni_Paolo_Panini|Giovanni Paolo Panini (1691 – 1765)]] ====
==== Collection from [[wikipedia:Giovanni_Paolo_Panini|Giovanni Paolo Panini (1691 – 1765)]] ====
<gallery mode="slideshow">
<gallery mode="slideshow">
File:Giovanni Paolo Panini 12.jpeg
File:Giovanni Paolo Panini 01.jpg
File:Giovanni Paolo Panini 01.jpg
File:Giovanni Paolo Panini 02.jpeg
File:Giovanni Paolo Panini 02.jpeg
Line 32: Line 33:
File:Giovanni Paolo Panini 10.jpeg
File:Giovanni Paolo Panini 10.jpeg
File:Giovanni Paolo Panini 11.jpeg
File:Giovanni Paolo Panini 11.jpeg
File:Giovanni Paolo Panini 12.jpeg
File:Giovanni Paolo Panini 13.jpeg
File:Giovanni Paolo Panini 13.jpeg
File:Giovanni Paolo Panini 14.jpeg
File:Giovanni Paolo Panini 14.jpeg
Line 43: Line 43:
File:Giovanni Paolo Panini 21.jpeg
File:Giovanni Paolo Panini 21.jpeg
File:Giovanni Paolo Panini 22.jpeg
File:Giovanni Paolo Panini 22.jpeg
</gallery><gallery mode="slideshow">
</gallery>
 
==== Collection from [[wikipedia:Giovanni_Battista_Piranesi|Giovanni Battista Piranesi (1720 – 1778)]] ====
<gallery mode="slideshow">
File:Giovanni battista piranesi 01.jpg
File:Giovanni battista piranesi 01.jpg
File:Giovanni battista piranesi 02.jpg
File:Giovanni battista piranesi 02.jpg
Line 77: Line 80:
There were multiple artists creating similar work. Engravings and paintings reflecting our world in ruins. To name a few of those artists:  
There were multiple artists creating similar work. Engravings and paintings reflecting our world in ruins. To name a few of those artists:  


* ''[[wikipedia:Giovanni_Paolo_Panini|Giovanni Paolo Panini]] (1691 – 1765)''
* ''[[wikipedia:Alessandro_Salucci|Alessandro Salucci]] (1590 –  c. 1655-60)''
* ''[[wikipedia:Alessandro_Salucci|Alessandro Salucci]] (1590 –  c. 1655-60)''
* ''[[wikipedia:Marco_Ricci|Marco Ricci]] (1676 – 1730)''
* ''[[wikipedia:Marco_Ricci|Marco Ricci]] (1676 – 1730)''
* ''[[wikipedia:Luigi_Rossini|Luigi Rossini]] (1790 - 1857)''
* ''[[wikipedia:Luigi_Rossini|Luigi Rossini]] (1790 - 1857)''
[[File:Alessandro Salucci - View with architecture, triumphal arch and figures.jpg|center|thumb|900x900px|Alessandro Salucci - View with architecture, triumphal arch and figures]]
[[Category:History]]
[[Category:History]]

Latest revision as of 00:16, 5 March 2025

Stolen History

Where has all the beautiful architecture of our past gone? Most of history has been fabricated by the parasite class, and there may have once been a more unified, advanced culture that was wiped away from our collective memory.

Part 1 - Introduction

Stolen History (Part 1)

Part 2 - The Destruction of the Old World

Painting by Canaletto - Dresden seen from the Right Bank of the Elbe, beneath the Augusts Bridge.
Stolen History (Part 2)

Part 3 - The Mystery of the World Fairs

Treasure Island, an artificial island created for the world fair.
Stolen History (Part 3)

Capriccio

Have a look at an artist famous for his etchings of Rome and of fictitious and atmospheric "prisons" (Le Carceri d'Invenzione). He was a so called Cappricio artist.

In other words, contemporary interpretation of his creations is that it was a fantasy of the author. There is no historical evidence that Capriccio artists were making stuff up. Such an interpretation appears to be a very convenient way to explain the inconvenient truth.

Collection from Giovanni Paolo Panini (1691 – 1765)

Collection from Giovanni Battista Piranesi (1720 – 1778)

There were many more of the so called Capriccio artists working within the same time frame. They observed the same objects in a very similar manner. It is so easy to dismiss the evidence by pretending that their creations were a work of fiction. What if they reflected exactly what was observed?

What do we see in those paintings and engravings? We see semi destroyed buildings, mud and dirt filling in spaces between those buildings. We do not see pavement or some sort of hard surface between the structures. Would imagine that people capable of building such structures were capable of quality work all the way around. And of course in their works we see small to medium size trees growing on those buildings and in places where should be no trees. Based on the size of those trees we could approximate when those trees started.

There were multiple artists creating similar work. Engravings and paintings reflecting our world in ruins. To name a few of those artists:

Alessandro Salucci - View with architecture, triumphal arch and figures